Goldenratio in circle10/30/2022 ![]() ![]() But that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re actually based on anything at all. You don’t have to look very far to find designs with proportions that are ‘close to’ the Golden Ratio. Or perhaps the original design of the iCloud logo WAS based precisely on the correct value for the golden section, but for reasons unknown was altered slightly somewhere down the line.īut I suppose my point is this. Or mistakenly thought that phi was 1.6000000… Maybe the designer intended to use the Golden Ratio, but felt that 1: 1.6 was near enough. The designer of the original Apple iCloud logo just created something that looked visually pleasing to him/her with NO (intentional) reference to the Golden Ratio. I guess there’s a few possible explanations. Well, as you can see, my ‘true’ Golden Ratio cloud is different, but not wildly different from the actual Apple iCloud symbol. That’s the beauty of sticking to an accurate value for the Golden Ratio – inevitably ‘happy accidents’ tend to be exact. The centre of the small circle also sits exactly halfway along a unit square horizontally. ![]() We can position it so that its left edge lines up vertically with the centre of the other circle. The smaller one can sit in a number of different and potentially ‘pleasing’ locations, but let’s try putting it on the line that splits the height of the bounding box according to the Golden Ratio. Let’s place the larger of them on the baseline at the left. Surely it would be churlish not to make them 1/φ and 1/φ²…? We now need two more ‘divinely proportioned’ diameters for our remaining two circles. The second circle is placed so it’s touching the baseline and the right edge. The first circle sits exactly on the line that divides the length of the box according to the golden ratio. The circles are now precisely in ‘divine’ proportion. A very quick and easy method is to halve the width and height of the bounding box and use these values as the diameters. The ratio of the diameters of our first two circles needs also to be exactly ‘golden’. This time, the ratio of height to length needs to be exactly 1:φ How easy would it be to tell them apart? And might one be more ‘beautiful’ than the other?įirst we need a bounding box to fit our cloud in. To find out if 1.6 really is close enough, I thought it might be interesting to see just what a ‘true’ Golden Ratio cloud icon might look like. GOLDENRATIO IN CIRCLE SOFTWAREI mean, if you’re going to the effort of basing something on the Golden Ratio, wouldn’t you try and get the number right, or at least use a better approximation? It’s not as if graphics software can’t handle more than one decimal place… Would the real iCloud please stand up Golden Section, Golden Mean, Divine Proportion, and often written as the Greek letter phi, φ) is (√5+1)/2 or 1.6180339887… So why would the Apple iCloud icon use a value of only 1.6? Perhaps by accident, rather than by design? The actual value of the Golden Ratio (a.k.a. I’m someone with more than a passing interest in cloud icons, so this got me wondering… The ratio of height to length of the whole cloud shape is also 1.6 – which is ‘close to’ the Golden Ratio. He explains that the basic shape of the cloud icon is based on four circles and both pairs of diameters are in the ratio 1:1.6. ![]() I recently came across an article (albeit from last year I think) by Takamasa Matsumoto concerning the Apple ‘iCloud’ icon and the Golden Ratio. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |